Is cheapness a bad thing? If not, why are two Southern politicians accused of anti-Semitism for admiring Jewish frugality?
The answer's easy enough: any mix of a statement about 'the Jews' as an entity mixed with a comment about wealth falls into the realm of Jews-and-money, of classic anti-Semitism, and as such is more or less the equivalent of referring to someone black as "articulate" - what's ostensibly a compliment is, given the context, not quite.
But at the same time, I'm struck by how different this evocation of Jews-and-money is from those politicians of a previous generation (in Europe, say) might have made. These guys want America to be more Jewish - granted according to their own warped idea of what 'Jewish' means. Often, right-wing politicians might have seen 'Jewish' financial acumen as modernity at its most offensive, and sung the praises of small-scale life, a slower pace, dare I say local agriculture. (I just went to the Union Square Greenmarket, where there were I want to say more people taking artsy photographs of the produce than actually shopping for produce.) Yes, things change, although Emile Zola was telling anti-Semites to learn from the Jews' money skillz ages ago.
But are Jews even frugal? Given that four of the six tight fists here are of the Mosaic persuasion, one might say 'yes.' But in my vast experience of Jews and non-Jews - I've got friends who are both, have dated both, and have both in my family - I'm going to have to say, meh. Jewish thrift is a bit like Jews' alleged aversion to alcohol - some relics remain, but that's all. At this point, everyone's heard about how for a long, long time in Europe, Jews were forbidden from owning land and from doing just about anything but peddling/money-lending to earn a living, and so came to have certain skills that turned out to be particularly valuable in the modern world, leading to jealousy, genocide, the works. But sufficient time has past since my family had to peddle anything that I have no special skills in this regard, and I am, it seems no more thrilled by discounted canned tomatoes than certain non-Jews with whom I shop for discounted cans of tomatoes.
But was the Jews-are-frugal stereotype ever even supposed to apply to women? Or is the expectation that The Jew earns and saves, while The Jewess spends and spends? Either way, I don't know what it says about my own prejudices, but when I first read about two South Carolina Republicans thinking Jews are good savers, my first thought was that neither had probably ever interacted with Jews before, regardless.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I'm not sure there is a good parallel for referring to Jews as being good at "taking care of the pennies," because while frugality -- particularly in government -- is a good thing, with regard to Jews it's just so closely tied to the Shylock stereotype of caring more about money than people (Club for Growth the new Elders of Zion?) that I don't think there's any way to put it without invoking the libel.
In contrast, the calling-black-guy-articulate problem is based not on articulateness ever being seen as taken to an extreme or otherwise bad, but rather on the whites' having low expectations of blacks. It's pretty standard to invoke Chris Rock here:
"Whenever Colin Powell is on the news, white people give him the same compliments: 'How do you feel about Colin Powell?' 'He speaks so well! He's so well spoken. I mean he really speaks so well!' Like that's a compliment. 'He speaks so well' is not a compliment, okay? 'He speaks so well' is some shit you say about retarded people that can talk. What do you mean he speaks so well? He's a fucking educated man! How the fuck did you expect him to sound, you dirty motherfucker? 'He speaks so well.' What are you talking about? What voice were you expecting to come out of his mouth? 'Imma drop me a bomb today', 'I be Pwez o dent!'"
The parallel to the SC Republicans' comments about Jews that came to mind for me was a different Biden blooper: saying South Asians had become so dominant in ownership of 7/11s and Dunkin Donuts, you had to have an Indian accent to walk into one these days. That's more like the "Jews are cheap" assumption: it can be spun as a positive (Indians are successful entrepreneurs) or as a negative (they tuk er jawbs). In context, Biden clearly meant it in a positive way, to indicate how down with the brown he was in DE.
However, I think it was less of a problem because there just hasn't been enough time for a particular negative stereotype of South Asians to form in the U.S. We've only been able to immigrate in significant numbers for the last 40 years, with the largest influxes coming in the last 25 years. I just didn't find Biden's 7/11 comment that offensive, whereas I'm glad the Obama campaign apologized for referring to Hillary Clinton as D-Punjab, because as with Israel, there's no positive spin to put on a reference to a politician being somehow beholden or loyal to another country.
Finally, you indicate that it's not really even accurate that Jews are particularly more frugal than non-Jews, whereas it's just a statistical fact that South Asian-Americans are hugely disproportionate in their ownership of certain labor-intensive businesses. The NYT reported several years ago that one third of the motels in the U.S. are owned by people with the last name Patel, while 37% of all hotels and motels are owned by Indians. I bet there are similar statistics for the 7/11s and Dunkin Donuts. It's silly to get upset if it's empirically true.
Wow. I lost all respect for the writer of the previous post and quit reading what he wrote immediately after seeing the vulgarity. Accusing people of being "fuckers" is not the way to get your opinion out. Educated individuals should and will give less value to the opinions of "emotionally violent" or "angry" people, like the previous post's author
Just discovered your blog (via googling "neurosis about money") and I absolutely love it.
Not sure if you still check these comments, but I felt compelled to thank you for your insights and for making me feel a little less odd/alone/cheap.
Post a Comment